Carbon dating new testament

In reality, there exist quite a number of facts that may lead to think that original New Testament was written in Aramaic - and Greek and Latin manuscripts are but a poor quality copies.

carbon dating new testament-48carbon dating new testament-87carbon dating new testament-7

Additional tests were done on six grain samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 16 B. and 12 charcoal samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 16 B. The literature on the subject is enormous, so I will not attempt to give you references.

There is a heated debate going on among scholars concerning this, especially with regard to the date of the eruption of Thera (Santorini).

Also be VERY careful about what you read about Diatessaron, Old Syriac and Peshitta. One of the earliest complete manuscripts of Peshitta is Khabouris Codex ( which is carbon-dated to 4th century but colophon states that it is a copy from older manuscript written in 164 AD.

I would advise to be VERY careful about dating of manuscripts and giving opinions thich one is "the best version". Apart of manuscripts there are found inscriptions on walls written in Estrangelo script which are dated to around 150 AD and are identical with what is found in Khabouris and other Peshitta codexes. If you're interested in Syriac, then there is something you should know.

Editorial note: The evidence for the destruction of Jericho at the time the Bible describes it and the way the Bible describes it is overwhelming.

Note: What is unusual about the two laboratory methods of dating is how they are being used.

The imposing Judahite fortress of Khirbet Qeiyafa has been securely dated by pottery and radiocarbon analysis to the early tenth century B. Proponents of low Bible chronology, called minimalists, claim the transition occurred around 920 to 900 B. Proponents of a high Bible chronology put the date around 1000 to 980 B. Some scholars have asked if radiocarbon dating accuracy will help settle the question. Radioactive carbon-14 is used to analyze an organic material, such as wood, seeds, or bones, to determine a date of the material’s growth.

Did they live in the archaeological period known as Iron Age I, which is archaeologically poorly documented, or in Iron Age IIa, for which more evidence is available.

However, my question: Is there some evidence that suggests an approximate date when the translation of the New Testament in Syriac was made?

Tags: , ,