Radiocarbon dating error factor

We must assume to know that the rate at which carbon-14 decays into nitrogen-14 hasn't somehow changed throughout the unobservable past.

radiocarbon dating error factor-63radiocarbon dating error factor-6

And finally, we must assume that there hasn't been any contamination in the specimen which we are attempting to date.

Scientific research has called the first two assumptions into question.

Carbon-14 cannot be used to date biological artifacts of organisms that did not get their carbon dioxide from the air.

This rules out carbon dating for most aquatic organisms, because they often obtain at least some of their carbon from dissolved carbonate rock.

Organic materials, which require the most processing, are limited to younger ages by their corresponding process blank.

Due to counting and measurement errors for the blanks and samples, statistical errors are higher for very old samples.

There are three carbon isotopes that occur as part of the Earth's natural processes; these are carbon-12, carbon-13 and carbon-14.

The unstable nature of carbon 14 (with a precise half-life that makes it easy to measure) means it is ideal as an absolute dating method.

In order to improve the accuracy of carbon dating, we must look at why these assumptions are questionable and how we can compensate for the uncertainties raised by our doubts.

Scientists have made progress with the second assumption by employing the use of dendrochronology (tree-ring dating). God, the Father, sent His only Son to satisfy that judgment for those who believe in Him.

Radiocarbon dating may only be used on organic materials.

Tags: , ,